Monday, October 31, 2005
Bill "At Least He's a Democrat" Clinton
I have a renewed and ferverent HATRED for Bill Clinton.
I rented the movie, "The Ghosts of Rwanda," from the PBS show, Frontline. It is about the Hutu genocide against the Tutsi's in Rwanda.
Bill "Can I Cum In Your Mouth" Clinton and Madeline "Acceptable Loss" Albright allowed and were complicit in the genocide of the Tutsi people of Rwanda. I was so offended by the words Bill Clinton was saying, he was excusing his inactions.
When the genocide was happening, I thought two things about it. One was that the U.S. government wasn't going to do anything to help a bunch of black people. Black on black violence is acceptable and enjoyable to the U.S. government (consistent pattern). Two was we musn't have economic interests there. There isn't anything in Rwanda that the U.S. government wants to steal for their corporate owners. Wouldn't you know it, I was right.
Because, right there, in front of the world, Bill was saying that the U.S. refused to help because we didn't have economic interests there. He wasn't so willing to admit that he only thought of these people as a bunch of niggers, though his actions and inactions stated that for him. Same with that fucking shithole Madeline Albright.
Gen. Dallare of the UN Peacekeepers was a hero in this action. His forces were reduced by 90% instead of a complete pullout, but enough to allow a maximum slaughter of blacks by other blacks. The man did as much as he could with so little, and those who could have helped didn't because there was no wealth to steal and all the people getting killed were black, or Niggers as the U.S. government might say in unrecorded meetings.
When Paul Rusesabegina spoke at Lewis and Clark as was asked why the U.S. didn't help, he stated it even more plainly, "Because there is no oil." Aint that the truth. Bill Clinton and Madeline Albright even said as much.
What stopped the genocide was the Tutsi rebels. In fact, the U.S. made many negotiated attempts to get the rebels to stop their advance. Why? In my opinion, the genocide could have killed even more niggers if the rebels didn't fight back. This opinion comes in the face of the consistent racist and genocidal policies of the U.S. government. Take, for example, New Orleans and Hurricane Katrina. U.S. actions and inactions in Rwanda, Darfur, and New Orleans should be proof enough of the U.S. racist and genocidal policies. They're letting a similar genocide happen in Darfur right now. No oil, and aint nothing but blacks getting murdered. Why the fuck help? Of course there is article 6, section 2 of the U.S. constitution which states "treaties are the supreme law of the land." And the U.S. did sign the Genocide treaty. But like I said, and many others as well, no oil in Darfur, and aint nothin' but blacks getting murdered.
That said, "Genocide Cover-Up Day" is on alleged Thanksgiving Day, November 24th, from 9am -noon. It will be on KBOO, 90.7fm. We will open the phone lines and discuss genocides near and far, past, present, and into the future. Tune in and call in if you wish.
I rented the movie, "The Ghosts of Rwanda," from the PBS show, Frontline. It is about the Hutu genocide against the Tutsi's in Rwanda.
Bill "Can I Cum In Your Mouth" Clinton and Madeline "Acceptable Loss" Albright allowed and were complicit in the genocide of the Tutsi people of Rwanda. I was so offended by the words Bill Clinton was saying, he was excusing his inactions.
When the genocide was happening, I thought two things about it. One was that the U.S. government wasn't going to do anything to help a bunch of black people. Black on black violence is acceptable and enjoyable to the U.S. government (consistent pattern). Two was we musn't have economic interests there. There isn't anything in Rwanda that the U.S. government wants to steal for their corporate owners. Wouldn't you know it, I was right.
Because, right there, in front of the world, Bill was saying that the U.S. refused to help because we didn't have economic interests there. He wasn't so willing to admit that he only thought of these people as a bunch of niggers, though his actions and inactions stated that for him. Same with that fucking shithole Madeline Albright.
Gen. Dallare of the UN Peacekeepers was a hero in this action. His forces were reduced by 90% instead of a complete pullout, but enough to allow a maximum slaughter of blacks by other blacks. The man did as much as he could with so little, and those who could have helped didn't because there was no wealth to steal and all the people getting killed were black, or Niggers as the U.S. government might say in unrecorded meetings.
When Paul Rusesabegina spoke at Lewis and Clark as was asked why the U.S. didn't help, he stated it even more plainly, "Because there is no oil." Aint that the truth. Bill Clinton and Madeline Albright even said as much.
What stopped the genocide was the Tutsi rebels. In fact, the U.S. made many negotiated attempts to get the rebels to stop their advance. Why? In my opinion, the genocide could have killed even more niggers if the rebels didn't fight back. This opinion comes in the face of the consistent racist and genocidal policies of the U.S. government. Take, for example, New Orleans and Hurricane Katrina. U.S. actions and inactions in Rwanda, Darfur, and New Orleans should be proof enough of the U.S. racist and genocidal policies. They're letting a similar genocide happen in Darfur right now. No oil, and aint nothing but blacks getting murdered. Why the fuck help? Of course there is article 6, section 2 of the U.S. constitution which states "treaties are the supreme law of the land." And the U.S. did sign the Genocide treaty. But like I said, and many others as well, no oil in Darfur, and aint nothin' but blacks getting murdered.
That said, "Genocide Cover-Up Day" is on alleged Thanksgiving Day, November 24th, from 9am -noon. It will be on KBOO, 90.7fm. We will open the phone lines and discuss genocides near and far, past, present, and into the future. Tune in and call in if you wish.
Subscribe to Posts [Atom]