Thursday, August 25, 2005
White Boys
Previously, I posted about Dwight Jaynes, a racist editor for the Portland Tribune. Dwight is one of those racist White Boys who will defend their subtle form of racism as completely justifiable. There are so many examples of this in our current U.S. society as to be assumed normal behavior. Kind of like the kid who grows up being beaten by their parents assumes that it is normal for kids to be beaten by their parents.
I have learned not to argue with these incredibly narrow minded white boys (I say boys because women don't do this anywhere near as much, probably because of the sexism they experience in this society and therefore have the ability of empathy). I have tried arguing with these white boys as one can read on the Littlest Blog. I have also seen this behavior at Reed College when Ward Churchill lectured there. During the questions and answers period, the young white boys, about 10 of them, lined up. Their questions amounted to: if we give Indians what is rightfully theirs, what about ME! Not what about "us," what about "me." White boys in the subtley racist category don't seem to see beyond the head of their cocks. No one, STILL, has ever commented on one fact I've noticed Ward Churchill bringing up every time I see him. The fact that Madeline Albright stated that it was an acceptable loss to have over 5000 Iraqi children a month die from preventable diseases. That's 5000 towel head sand niggers that aren't WHITE BOYS, so why should white boys give a fuck. Those kids are well beyond they heads of their cocks. Besides, Madeline Albright is a democrat, therefore her genocidal behavior is rarely questioned by the alleged left.
What's worse, is these white boys are so locked into their white supremacist racist imperialism as for it to seem normal to them. How dare some of us lesser folk suggest that it just isn't the way it is supposed to be, meaning that white men dominate us for our own good, which actually means the privilege they are used to receiving at the expense of us lesser folks.
I could argue with Dwight Jaynes for the rest of my life, and just like Michael Newman, his heart will never feel empathy for the experience of other races or sexes. He is automatically superior via the color of his skin and the fact that he has a cock. When white men get locked in this mode of thinking, there is no changing their minds because, in their opinions, they are white...er...right, and therefore everyone else is automatically wrong (unless they agree with them). They will base this in shoddy science or in pulledoutofmyass.com thinking. It must be white...er...right, if they managed to pull it out of their own superior white male asses, right. And when a white man tells us inferior darkies that he isn't racist, we must just take it as fact, afterall, he is a white man and telling us he isn't racist and therefore he is right (white). In my experience, there is NO changing the hearts of these stupid fucking white men, so I don't bother.
I will, however, point out their behavior so others who are on this side of the tracks, as it were, can see the behavior of these types of people for what it is and decide for themselves whether or not these people are worthy of trust.
I have learned not to argue with these incredibly narrow minded white boys (I say boys because women don't do this anywhere near as much, probably because of the sexism they experience in this society and therefore have the ability of empathy). I have tried arguing with these white boys as one can read on the Littlest Blog. I have also seen this behavior at Reed College when Ward Churchill lectured there. During the questions and answers period, the young white boys, about 10 of them, lined up. Their questions amounted to: if we give Indians what is rightfully theirs, what about ME! Not what about "us," what about "me." White boys in the subtley racist category don't seem to see beyond the head of their cocks. No one, STILL, has ever commented on one fact I've noticed Ward Churchill bringing up every time I see him. The fact that Madeline Albright stated that it was an acceptable loss to have over 5000 Iraqi children a month die from preventable diseases. That's 5000 towel head sand niggers that aren't WHITE BOYS, so why should white boys give a fuck. Those kids are well beyond they heads of their cocks. Besides, Madeline Albright is a democrat, therefore her genocidal behavior is rarely questioned by the alleged left.
What's worse, is these white boys are so locked into their white supremacist racist imperialism as for it to seem normal to them. How dare some of us lesser folk suggest that it just isn't the way it is supposed to be, meaning that white men dominate us for our own good, which actually means the privilege they are used to receiving at the expense of us lesser folks.
I could argue with Dwight Jaynes for the rest of my life, and just like Michael Newman, his heart will never feel empathy for the experience of other races or sexes. He is automatically superior via the color of his skin and the fact that he has a cock. When white men get locked in this mode of thinking, there is no changing their minds because, in their opinions, they are white...er...right, and therefore everyone else is automatically wrong (unless they agree with them). They will base this in shoddy science or in pulledoutofmyass.com thinking. It must be white...er...right, if they managed to pull it out of their own superior white male asses, right. And when a white man tells us inferior darkies that he isn't racist, we must just take it as fact, afterall, he is a white man and telling us he isn't racist and therefore he is right (white). In my experience, there is NO changing the hearts of these stupid fucking white men, so I don't bother.
I will, however, point out their behavior so others who are on this side of the tracks, as it were, can see the behavior of these types of people for what it is and decide for themselves whether or not these people are worthy of trust.
Subscribe to Posts [Atom]