Pudgy Indian

Pat Robertson, whom I assume has never been to Venezuela, but owns interest in the same diamond mines that Osama Bin Laden owned or owns interst in, is calling for the assassination of Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez. I assume, though could be wrong, that Pat Robertson owns some sort of interest in say, maybe, the oil industry which has an interest in Venezualan oil.

First, let me point out something: It is mostly the Indigenous people, the most severely oppressed people in Venezuela, that put Chavez in his current position and is holding him accountable for his actions. In a previous post I noted a quote from Pat Robertson I gleaned from the book, "Conquest: Sexual Violence and American Indian Genocide," by Andrea Smith where Robertson stated that we Indians have "...scant wisdom or learning or philosophical vision that can be instructive to a society that can feed the entire population..." etc. Basically stating that we Indians are stupid before the superior intellect of white Christian males, which I must point out here, do NOT feed the entire population. Therefore, Pat is breaking one of the 10 commandments there, thou shalt not LIE! Hmmm! Must be OK, because Pat is better than God!

Pat is breaking another commandment in calling for the assassination of Hugo Chavez, President of Venezuela: thou shalt not kill. Mind you, there are degrees of separation which I'm sure Pat could state are not actually killing, therefore he is not breaking one of the commandments. However, if I tell someone that they should kill somebody for whatever reason, it is the same as using a weapon to murder someone. The weapon I am using is a fellow human being. Therefore, I would be responsible for that persons life. So, it is OK for Pat to commit murder because he is not committing the murder first hand. In my opinion, Pat must see himself above God because if he, as an alleged representative of said God, can openly break the rules his god set forth in stone to Moses, he must consider God incorrect in making such a commandment.

However, being an Indian, I know this to be typical Christian behavior. It seems that since Christ was around, that he somehow made it legal to commit horrible, heinous, and senseless crimes against humanity and all life forms because all one simply has to do is say, "forgive me Jesus," and all is great and beautiful in the world. Christians have raped, murdered, tortured, imprisoned, and enslaved Indian Children in their boarding schools. Christians have committed genocide, slaughtered millions of people, oppress millions of people, and enslave millions of people, which seem to be both justified and unjustifiable by the book they uphold known as the bible. So, the Felony Pat Robertson has committed in calling for an international assassination, will go completely unpunished by his fellow Christians in the alleged Christian administration of the U.S. Government. However, murder, rape, genocide, and so many other crimes are indeed a well known Christian behavior throughout history. Here, I will point out that all the men that sat around the table at the Wannsee (sp?) Conference which decided the Final Solution of the Jews for Nazi Germany were, indeed, Christian, and did, indeed, have the support of the Vatican where a Nazi now sits as pope.

In conclusion, though Pat Robertson's behavior is indeed criminal, it is TYPICAL CHRISTIAN BEHAVIOR. All one has to do is look throughout history. Look at what the Christians have done to Iraq and Afghanistan and the Phillipines, Africa, the Middle East, Asia, the Americas, and indeed, all over the world. Christianity is the most destructive force ever.

I tried reading the bible once. I couldn't get past Lott and his daughters. The book so disgusted me.

Pat Robertson is not an example of the extreme Christian right, he is an example of a typical Christian.